Pioneering, 3D-printed design with a novel porous structure, that supports soft tissue in-growth
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e3e5/0e3e5c9ec675d7014155587d3d885f9cd3aee68f" alt=""
ELEOS™ LIMB SALVAGE SYSTEM
Helping to address soft tissue failures and aseptic loosening, all in a personalized, simplified fashion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a5c0/9a5c093af5d4a38264d8aa96d223eee85efa751a" alt=""
ELEOS™ PROXIMAL TIBIAL REPLACEMENT FEATURING BioGrip® TECHNOLOGY
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9ba9/c9ba95bbe9827b4ecd064affe27187a37fa3b06a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da567/da56786ae6fb5d6598f244aca0835602355432ba" alt=""
SOFT TISSUE FAILURES ARE A LEADING CAUSE OF LIMB SALVAGE PROSTHESIS FAILURE1
- Fixation and healing of the soft tissue envelope is important for long-term success
- Proximal tibia prostheses require soft tissue ingrowth and attachment features, specifically for the patellar tendon and gastrocnemius flap
ELEOS™ Proximal Tibial Replacement with BioGrip®
-
Novel pore structure to support soft tissue ingrowth2,3,4
- Pore size range of 502-758µm4
- Average porosity of 60%4
-
Key studies suggest soft tissue ingrowth is more prevalent in pores between 600-1000µm2,3
- Most commercially available porous designs have an average range of 400-550µm
-
Anatomically aligned suture holes in three-directional planes
Provide directional attachment of adjacent soft tissues
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49ad5/49ad527d196f2a1af6bf65caf77fbc0702d1ebc0" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da567/da56786ae6fb5d6598f244aca0835602355432ba" alt=""
Product information
Limb Salvage System
ELEOS™ and ELEOS™ with NanoCept™ Technology Limb Salvage System
Let us help you plan your next procedure
References
1. Henderson ER, et al. Failure mode classification for tumor endoprosthesis: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(5):418-429. 2. Dickey IA, et al. Pore size and morphology modulate strength of soft tissue in-growth into porous titanium implants. Poster presented at: 54th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; San Francisco, CA; March 2-5,2008. 3. Dickey IA, et al. Pore size modulates strength of soft-tissue in-growth and growth factor expression in novel porous titanium implants. Poster presented at: 55th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; Las Vegas, NV; February 22-25, 2009. 4. Data on File, Onkos, 2020